Efficiency of state administration: organization of process of influence of elements of control system
Keywords:
efficiency, effective management, state administration, society, modernization of economy, system, control, development, strategy, strategic choice, investments, scientific and technical, structural and investment policy, efficiency of investmentsAbstract
In the article reasons of unsatisfactory state administration are investigated by development of еconomies country, maintenance of the system of measures is certain and important sources and factors of efficiency of state administration are investigational by development of economy (an improvement of structure and control system, rational application of technique, is in a management). There are basic problem questions of decision of strategic tasks of modernization of our state in the article of considered. The necessity of development of long - term strategy of economic development of economy is grounded: a 1) acceptance of strategic decisions, concentration of efforts on "breach" direction, active scientific and technical and structural policy of the state; 2) the instruments of realization of strategy of development, which takes into account incuriosity of the developed countries in walking of Ukraine away from the raw material orientation of economy, are offered, in strengthening of her positions in hi - tech industries of production.References
Goodnow, F. Politics and Administration. - Macmillan: New York, 1990. – C. 75-82.
Gulick, L., Urwick, L. Papers on the Science of Administration. – Institute of Public Administration: New York, 1937. – C. 192.
Mosher, F. Democracy and the Public Service. – Oxford University Press: New York, 1968. – С.71.
Mark, J. Progress in Productivity in Government: Federal, State; and Local// Public Productivity Review, 1981. – March.
Brandford, D. F., et al. The Rising Cost of Local Public Services: Some Evidence and Reflections// National, 1969. – V. ХХІІ.
Hgerppe, Rcino, T. The Measurement of Real Output of Public Sector Services// The Review of Income and Wealth, 1980. – June.
Эффективность государственного управления / Пер. с англ. М.: Консалтбанкир, 1998; Бусыгин, А.В. Эффективность менеджмента: Учебник. М.: Финпресс, 2000; Друкер, Питер Ф. Эффективное управление: Экономические задачи и оптимальные решения / Пер. с анг. М.: Гранд –Фаир – Пресс, 2002; Эффективное управление фирмой: Современная теория и практика. СПб.: Бизнес- Пресс, 1999; и многие другие публикации.
Мескон, М.Х., Альберт, М., Хедуори, Ф. Основы менеджмента. М.: Дело, 1992, С. 699.
Отчет о мировом развитии, 1997 г. М: Прайм-ТАСС, 1997. С. 4.
Винер, Н. Кибернетика и общество. М: Наука, 1958. С. 45.
Stieglitz, J.E. More Instruments and Broader Goals: Moving toward Post-Washington Consensus? Jan. 1998. P.19.
. Пересада А. А.Управління інвестиційним процесом. - К. : Лібра, 2002. - 471 с.
46. Kolodko G. W. Globalization and Catching-up in Emerging Market Economies (http: // kolodko.tiger.edu.p1).
Ясин Е Г., Яковлев А.А. Конкурентоспособность и модернизация российской экономики // Вопросы экономики. - 2004. - № 7. - С. 4-34.
Губанов С. С. Глубинные проблемы инвестиционных процессов //Экономист.- 2001.- №8.- С. 22-27.
Stern S., Porter M. E. and Furman J. L. The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity. NBER Working Paper № 7876, September 2000 (http: // www.nber.org/papers/w7876).
Nelson R. (1993). National Innovation Systems : F Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Phelps D. (2004) AMERICAN Steel Trade Policy, the US Steel Industry, and the Importance of Free Trade for Economic Growth. Adam Smith Institute, The CIS and Eastern European Steel Summit, Moscow, Russia, February 4.
Aghion P. and Howitt P. Vjdel of Growth Through Creative Destruction // Econometrica. 1992.Vol. 60. № 2 (March) P. 323-351;
Grossman G. and Helpman E. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, Ma.: The VIT Press, 1991.
Lusas R. (1988). On the Mechanism of Economic Development // Journal of Monetary Economics. . Vol. 22. P. 3-42;
Romer P.M. Endogenous Technological Change // Journal of Political Economy. 1990. Vol. 98. №5. P. 71-102;
Мау В. А. Посткоммунистическая Россия в постиндустриальном мире: проблемы догоняющего развития // Вопросы экономики, - 2002. - № 7. С. 4-25.
Лившиц В.Н. Системный анализ нестационарной экономики России (1992 - 2009): рыночные реформы, кризис, инвестиционная политика / - М.: Поли Принт Сервис, 2010. - 452 с.
Рей А. Конкурентные стратегии государства и фирм в экспортно ориентированном развитии // Вопросы экономики . - 2004.- № 8. - С. 46-65.
Иванова Н.И. Национальные инновационные системы // Вопросы экономики. -2001. -№ 7. -С. 59-70.
Chodak S. The new State. Boulder London: Lynne Reiner Publishers . 1989.
Phelps D. AMERICAN Steel Trade Policy, the US Steel Industry, and the Importance of Free Trade for Economic Growth. Adam Smith Institute, The CIS and Eastern European Steel Summit, Moscow, Russia, February 4, 2004.
Richardson J.J. Doing Less by Doing More: British Government 1973-93 // West European Politics. 1994. Vol. 17. № 4. P. 97-178.
Коуз Рональд. Фирма, рынок и право/пер. с анг. Б. Пинскера/. – М.: Дело ЛТД, 1993. – 192 с.
Норт Д. Институты и экономический рост: историческое введение // THESIS. 1993. Т. 1. Вып. 2. С. 69-91.
Hausman R., Rodrik D. Economic Development as Self-Discovery. John F.. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University Faculty Research Working Papers Series March 2002 RWPO2-023. P. 7.
Дементьев В.Е. «Догоняющая постиндустриализация» и промышленная политика. Препринт № WP /2006/199. М.: ЦЭМИ РАН, 2006. – 124 с.
